viernes, 4 de diciembre de 2009

A POETIC RESPONSE TO WAR

During this term, in British Literature class, we have reviewed several poems by British writers. Most of the poems were related to feelings and emotions that the authors had regarding specific topics. In this particular case, I will focus on the feelings that two poets had regarding wars, its characteristics and the response they emitted to this theme. I will base this essay on the first stanza of a poem named “September 1st, 1939” by W.H. Auden. Also, as a way to complement the explanation of the poem, I will compare it with a stanza of a poem by another poet; William Butler Yeats. The reason that I have to base my essay on these poets and their responses to war is that the role that poets played during war time is something admirable and worth analyzing, due to their powerful influence in people’s life.
To start, I am going to contextualize the situation that the world was living regarding wars. In 1939, Germany launched its invasion to Poland. Poland was easily defeated because the Nazi Force, leaded by Hitler, was very strong and it was allied with the Soviet Union. This event marked the begging of the Second World War. As a result of the starting of S.W.W., a response by poets was almost unavoidable.
First, I will explain the fist stanza of the Auden’s poem; September 1st 1939.


“I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odour of death
Offends the September night.”



In the first five lines, the poet explained the mental and physical situation he was living. He described the place in which he was. He said he was sitting in a type of bar, with bad feelings about the future and without many encouraging possibilities to success or to get over the military situation he was living.
In the next four lines, Auden described the atmosphere that was surrounding him. First, he explained that anger and fear were the feelings that could be perceived. Also, he pointed out that shadows of suffering and pain were sensations that he could feel. These feelings were not suitable for anybody; in fact, they were the ones who maintained people scared. In the last two lines he

mentioned the odour of death and what it caused to the moment he was living. These words are tremendously descriptive, as a matter of fact, these are the words that make the reader feel and think the way the writer was feeling.
Clearly, the author of the poem was not feeling good with the events that were occurring during September 1939. He responded to the war with a strong and direct poem, in order to make people feel that what was happening was horrible and necessarily they need do something about it, at least, to reflect about the actions that governments were making.
Meanwhile Germany and Poland were holding a war, some people, such as W.H. Auden was reacting to these actions, but through a very soft and romantic way. What could be more opposite and at the same time similar to war than poetry? Wars are events that are developed in very noisy and dangerous places. On the other hand, poems are pieces of writings that are generally written in quiet places; maybe a library or a café, but they have strong and sometimes destructive intentions, these intentions can also be appreciated in wars.
As a way of complementing the analysis of poems about war, I will present another piece of writing related to war’s response. In 1916, several years before W.W.II, William Butler Yeats wrote a poem in which he exposed his point of view; regarding the military situation that Ireland was living. On April 24, 1916 British troops stood duty in Dublin, as a way of under press the country. Clearly, Ireland was not living a good moment because it was being invaded by British forces. While, all these events were taking place in Dublin and the rest of the cities, a poetic response was about to be written. W.B. Yeats wrote a poem named Easter 1916. In this piece of writing he expressed his feeling of sorrow and dissatisfaction.


“I have passed with a nod of the head
Or polite meaningless words,
Or have lingered (wait) awhile and said
Polite meaningless words,
And thought before I had done
Of a mocking tale or a gibe (aggressive person)
To please a companion
Around the fire at the club,
Being certain that they and I
But lived where motley (colored faces) is worn:
All changed, changed utterly(completely):
A terrible beauty is born”


What I could appreciate from this poem was that the author had done many things that he barely reflected on. When he explained that said meaningless words, he claimed that he was doing certain actions just because he was use to do them, that is to say, he did not did them consciously.
Also, in lines from seventh to tenth, he explained the hard relationship he established with other people. He said his companion were under the fire that a place had. It recalled the battle field in which soldiers were, and also that they were close to enemy’s weapons and bullets. In line number ten, he described the type of make up that soldiers wore. He made reference to paint the soldier must use when battling.
In this poem Yeats reflected his way of seeing regarding some war’s topics. The same thing occurred with Auden: he also gave his point of view and critic to wars. Both writers did not agree with the military moment that their countries were living, and instead of reacting physically, they preferred to do it by writing. This way, their response will last in the time and could be read and studied by other people.
I really enjoyed the way writers participated of wars. This is so admirable since they allow people like me to know about wars, but not throughout the typical way, which is by reading historical book or attending to history lessons. I did not know that poetry could get me in touch with historical facts the way these authors did.
To conclude, I want to point out is the way in which both authors dealt with the topic of wars was very intelligent and precise. Auden and Yeats chose a different way to react to wars. They decided to do by writing, instead of fighting or protesting in streets. Clearly, both of them selected a way in which their opinion could prevail in time. In some way, both poems echo each other, even though they were written in different times. What did not change was the way they responded to war.







Work Cited
Auden, Wystan Hugh September 1st 1939.

Biege, Bernd The Easter Rising of 1916 - British Revenge Leading to Stronger Nationalism.

Yeats, William Butler Easter 1916.

lunes, 30 de noviembre de 2009

Outline

I. Introduction

II. Analysis of the poem.
1. Explanation first stanza.
2. Audens' reaction.

III. Conextion between Auden's poem and Yeat's poem.
1. Explanation of one stanza.

IV. Personal point of view

V. Conclusion.

viernes, 20 de noviembre de 2009

About Rocio's blog entry.

"The most important topic in Virginia Woolf’s essay is the genre issue. During those times, woman did not have the same rights than man, but do they have them now? I don’t think so. We have the same problem 70 years later.
In terms of writing, women were not suppose write or read certain topics like philosophy, religion, science fiction, and so on. After a few years, women started writing and reading what they wanted, but they were always critized because of it. Virginia discusses if women are able to write or create pieces of work as good as men do. At that time, women were not allowed to enter to all of the university or even to walk on the grass. Women were left a side, but they started to win their territory step by step.
The most interesting part of this essay, for me, was the fact that the problems those women lived 70 years ago are still an issue. Women are still mistreated, earn less money and men tend to believe that women are less intelligent than men. We need to change that way of thinking. We need to realize that women can do thing sometimes better than men, and the other way around too. Women have their weaknesses, but we have our strengths too."


Rocio:

I share the idea that you have developed in this blog entry. I think that the author of this piece of writing has dealt with a topic that was very strong in those times, and it is still strong nowadays. I think in our society, women have certain disadvantages that men do not. Specifically, women have differences in terms of money, job opportunities, rights, etc. The problem is that the society does not do concrete actions regarding women rights. I think men and women have the same qualities to develop. Nonetheless, there are some areas in which men work better than women, and the other way around.
What I liked from this poet is that she could come up with the idea of women rights in those times. That current society was even stronger than the one are living today, so raise those types of ideas was something almost forbidden, but she did it anyway. Such a brave girl, don’t you think?
I enjoyed the theme you selected to develop. It is very controversial and it has a lot of edges to debate.

domingo, 15 de noviembre de 2009

Eliot and his poem....

I think that Eliot wrote a confusing poem. In the one hand, tried to mix many elements related to nature. On the other hand, he brought some features related to the war that was being developed in those times.
I have to accept that I did not understand the poem very well. It was a little hard for me to dig it. Regarding the elements he included in the poem, I would say he wrote it not thinking about a piece of writing but about a piece of art. Maybe that is the reason why I could not understand it well. Art may be abstract, and sometimes not possible to understand.

domingo, 8 de noviembre de 2009

Two stories!


I can say that D.H.Lawrence had a particular of writing. He used to relate some personal features to their writings. In "Odour of Chrysanthemums" he developed the idea of a miner worker and everything that is related to the way miners live. It was not casuality that his father was a miner, and in a way, he tried to describe some situations that he probably lived with his father.
On the other, in "The rocking horse winner” he showed the problems that a kid faced. That kid was worried about the troubles that his mother was living. Those problems were related to money and material possessions' issues. What this kind wanted to do was to get money in order to help his mother. I think helping parents is well, but sometimes children or adolescences do this to get closer to their parents. Nowadays, some parents tend to leave their children aside when they have to deal with economical issues.
I think that this author wrote about some situations that were, are and will be present along the whole human life. Sometimes is surprising to realize how some problems do not change in the society, even if several years have passed.

martes, 13 de octubre de 2009

V Woolf

After reading the Virginia’s text, I could realise that she had some preferences to women’s than men’s pieces of work. She analysed a piece of work written by a woman. She highlighted many aspects related to women, not to man’s.
In classes, with some classmates, we were discussing this preference that the writer had by women. We concluded that probably she had sexual preferences to women. Perhaps she liked women. I am not saying this is good or bad, I’m just referring to the fact that it is so common that people who analyse writers, artists, etc. use to make emphasize on their sexual inclinations.
I think it should not happen. I do not think that sexuality determinates the quality of someone. Sometimes, people tend to discriminate others because these reasons and this is not fair at all. Personal life should not interfere in professional life.

domingo, 27 de septiembre de 2009

Children's behaviour... time ago and current time.



The story of Oliver twist shows many facts that belong to the same reality. One hand, the story is developed in a crowded England, in which the opportunities were not so much. On the other hand, the story developed the idea of a child who used to steal. Taking into consideration both topics, I can infer that, in a way, the society could be responsible for Oliver’s action. I am not saying that Oliver’s actions were right, but they may be occasioned because of the problems he had to face.
In today’s world, specifically in our country, there are some features that are closely connected with the English’s 19th society. Our city is very crowded. Most of people have a car and because of that streets are full of them. Related to public transportation, the problems that Santiaguinos had to live were several. There were not enough buses to move to the quantity of people that the city have. This problem showed to society how much people need to get a bus for many reasons.
Probably, England does not have this problem today, but there are others countries that are facing these problems now. I think every country have their time to face radical changes.